185,447 notes // reblog
3,031 notes // reblog
2,063 notes // reblog
38,536 notes // reblog
317 notes // reblog
211,811 notes // reblog
2,021 notes // reblog
askinnyblackman: this isn’t the park you piece of shit 373,500 notes // reblog
17,650 notes // reblog
3,262 notes // reblog
getbehindme-satan: ollygollymolly: brostephhhx: this time I really am sorry because i dont even fuckin know what I’m doing anymore IT’S BEEN THREE WEEKS. Supernatural you have 172 FUCKING EPISODES and Sherlock has 6 get your shit together. 9,122 notes // reblog
rad1calcunt: ging3rnut: Got bored :3 Woah, hey :3 79 notes // reblog
magicalnaturetour: Picture: Anupam Nath/AP 978 notes // reblog

deathbat03:

Omfg im so in love with Zacky Vengeance. This is really what i need, another unhealthy obession that i can do NOTHING ABOUT.

22 notes // reblog
fitter-than-before: skinnyfitandsexy: jojoworksout: skinny-alcoholic: jojoworksout: Wow, this is thought provoking. Okay this might seem random, but you know what pisses me off: When men (I’m not talking about all men, just men I’ve heard say it) look at pictures of stick thin models and say, “Ew, I like curves on a woman! Bones are for dogs!” blah blah blah blah. But by curves they mean “a tiny waist and toned legs but a huge ass and boobs”. It is so much easier to just exercise yourself down to a thin/toned body than it is to have a giant ass and boobs AND a tight tummy. They think they’re being progressive by saying Kate Upton is more attractive than Keira Knightley and they’re not. They’re not not not. It’s just promoting another equally unattainable beauty standard. >80 AGREED, 100% seriously !! ^^^^ ^^ god bless this,  156,888 notes // reblog
theme credit
classy-lovely